Student leaders recommend not adopting AI for adoption’s sake
CALGARY – As the world of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to rapidly grow, the University of Calgary Students’ Union (SU) is concerned about the impact the technology has on student learning and their development.
The SU provided written and verbal feedback to the Expert Panel on AI Impacts on Labour Markets and Educational Post-secondary Outcomes on September 18, emphasizing that while the technology is new, that doesn’t mean it’s necessary for learning.
“We’re not surprised that the Government of Alberta is taking a closer look at AI in learning,” says Gabriela Dziegielewska, SU President. “A few years ago, conversations around AI focused on cheating. Now, we’re seeing that students and faculty alike are applying AI to every part of academia.”
With AI usage rising at post-secondary institutions, it’s time for institutions to develop and maintain policies around how the technology can be used and implemented.
Feedback given to the expert panel also outlined the harm AI is having on students’ ability to critically think.
“In my third year, AI started to be more pronounced in post-secondary learning,” says Zoe Zeritsch, SU Vice-President Academic. “I started to use it like my peers, and before I knew it, I began to simply turn to AI first. Through constant usage, I could feel my own cognitive decline.”
The SU is recommending that training should be provided to students, staff and faculty on what AI can do, its limitations and how to use it effectively. Without proper training, those using AI tools fail to understand how its dangers as well as its applications.
As the technology continues to develop, post-secondaries also have an opportunity to embrace alternative forms of assessment to better promote genuine learning. Still, student leaders emphasize that AI should not be used for grading. Human review still must be done to ensure students are learning and Alberta does not see a situation where AI grading is tasked with marking AI submissions.
At the forefront of the AI conversation is data and privacy, which should be safeguarded when developing policy surrounding AI. Students should have the option to report improper AI use without feeling they could be penalized for doing so.
“AI works best as a tool of convenience for people with established abilities,” concludes SU President Gabriela. “Our post-secondary institutions excel at teaching those abilities. Adoption for adoption’s sake will prevent our future skilled workers from developing independent expertise by taking them straight to the shortcuts.”
We urge the expert panel to listen to recommendations made on the potential harm of AI use and allowing it to remain unregulated.
- Read the SU’s full written submission to the Expert Panel.
- Read the SU’s summary fact sheet on its written submission.
Quick facts
- As more employers find AI literacy desirable, 77 percent of Canadian post-secondary students expect their institution to offer AI training (KPMG)
- 42 percent of Canadians use AI at work; just 12 percent have taken formal training (Growclass)
- Of the 73 percent of Canadian students who use AI tools in academia, almost half admit their “first instinct” upon receiving a written assignment is to generate a first draft with AI (KPMG)
- A 2025 survey of over 2,000 US schoolteachers found that 60 percent had used AI in the past year, with 79 percent of those respondents using AI tools to save time on grading assignments (The 74)
About the University of Calgary Students’ Union
We represent over 30,000 undergraduates at the University of Calgary and work to bring their concerns to various levels of government as well as the university. For media inquiries please contact: christian.apostolovs@ucalgary.ca
About the Expert Panel on AI Impacts on Labour Markets and Educational Post-secondary Outcomes
The Expert Panel was convened by the Government of Alberta to advise the Ministry of Advanced Education on the responsible and effective integration of AI within Alberta’s post-secondary system. Their final report is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2026.
Members
The Expert Panel is composed of seven AI entrepreneurs, executives, and analysts: Nicole Janssen (chair), Stephanie Enders, Neerja Gupta, Dr. Jessalyn Holodinsky, Michael Lim, Celia Wanderley and Aarn Wennekers.
-30-